If before this, a newly-proposed smart card
that contains a microchip is being introduced to the world whereby it allow the
user to record his bank account, and then debit and credit this bank account as
he buys and sells. However, if this smart card gets lost, anyone who finds it
could empty out this bank account. So it has been reported from various sources
that the money of the future is to be a MICROCHIP underneath the SKIN — so it
could not be lost!
Years ago, if anyone would speak about
having a microchip inserted underneath the skin, people could not even be
imagined how such a ridiculous idea like that could ever happen. But today,
such technology does it exist, and it is being perfected from time to time.
The VeriChip
(ID Microchip) is the first radio-frequency identification (RFID) microchip
that’s been approved by the Food and Drug Administration for use in humans. The
chip is the size of a long grain of rice, and can be implanted pretty much
anywhere in the body (most commonly along the tricep). (source-singularityhub.com)
Depending on how it’s used, the chip could
do anything from telling doctors your medical background to buying you a round
at the club. Most proposed applications for in-body RFID are medical in nature
which providing doctors immediately with a patient’s medical records, or
identification if they are unconscious or unable to communicate. Not only that,
there is a nightclub in Barcelona called Baja Beach has used the chip
implantation for business purpose. They started offering chip implants to its
customers, giving them access to VIP lounges and letting clubbers buy drinks by
acting as a debit account. Who wants to carry a wallet or purse when the
dress-code is board shorts and bikinis? Baja Beach contracted none other than
VeriChip Corp. to fashion their subcutaneous membership cards.
Outside of human bodies, RFID is already
used for a wide range of purposes. If you pay highway tolls electronically,
that little box in your car has an RFID tag in it. Lots of folks implant their
pets with RFID chips in case they get lost, as animal shelters increasingly
scan pets for them. There is a high possibility the lost pets will come back home with the presence of ID microchips that being implanted under their skin.
However, implanted ID Microchip under human
skin has both positive and negative impact.
People who are favor this ID Chipping will look more on the benefit of
it and people who are against this idea will consider all the negative impact
that might arise. (source-lockergnome.com)
Those who favor using implanted chipping
for ID purposes present the following arguments:
§
It would benefit the caregivers of the elderly, especially those
who suffer from Alzheimer’s or dementia, since it would make it easier for them
to be located if they wandered off. In this case, it would mean that they could
be returned to the safety of their home.
§
It would be a way of locating missing children. This could be an
invaluable resource if the child was abducted and not just off playing.
§ It would be valuable in the event that a child suffering from an
abnormality (such as autism) could be quickly located if they became lost or if
they needed to receive medical treatment.
- The chip can be used to readily access medical information — any pertinent health information that might be needed by emergency personnel.
- The chip can be used for identification purposes, making going through security checkpoints easier.
Those who are against implanted chips
into humans for any purpose present these arguments:
§
First and seemingly at the forefront of their argument are
privacy issues. They cite that their paramount concern is that the government
is already in a position of unwarranted control into the lives of its citizens
and that chipping would allow them the ability to track us no matter where we
went.
§
This goes hand in hand with religious concerns that the
embedding of identification chips could be a prelude to what is referred to in
the Bible as the Mark of the Beast. This is a numerical digit that would be
placed on a person’s hand or forehead and then scanned whenever something is
sold or purchased.
§
Medically, they cite concerns that, for those with auto immune
type diseases, the embedding of a chip could lead to infection - the potential
risks to health associated with the device are: adverse tissue reaction;
migration of implanted transponder; failure of implanted transponder; failure
of inserter;
§
Additionally, critics point out that if the person is issued a
bracelet with an RFID chip — rather than having one embedded in the skin — they
are then allowed the freedom to choose whether they wish to wear the bracelet
or not.
However, in the long run there is really only one real issue and
that is how you feel about having an ID chip put under your skin. Do you believe that it will really
interfere with your constitutional right to privacy? Do you have a religious
conviction about having one implanted in your body? Do you think that having
medical information available in the event of an accident is important?
Each of us has to decide the answers to the above questions for ourselves.
So, SHOULD or SHOULDN't the ID microchip is being implanted under human skin??? The answer is no matter which side of the issue you are on, whether you are
for or against chips being embedded under your skin, I believe you should be
allowed the freedom of choice for yourself and for those in your care. I also
believe that there are rational opinions
on both sides of the issue and that we should all respect and support the
choices of others in the matter.